Short Period And Sore Nipples

bill state and reception areas

Appendix to the minutes of the meeting of June 17, 2009

PROPOSED LAW

on obligations of the State with respect to areas of Home of the people travel ,

PRESENTED

By Hervé Maurey, Jean-Paul Amoudry, Détraigne Yves Jean Leonce-DUPONT, Jean-Jacques JEGOU, Jean-Claude MERCERON, Yves Pozzo di Borgo, Lawrence BETEILLE, Joël Billard, Alain Chatillon, Marcel Peter Cléach Christian DEMUYNCK Bernard Fournier, Gisèle Gautier, MM. Antoine Lefevre, Jean-Pierre Leleux, Roland's Luart Jackie STONE, Charles and Philippe RICHERT REVET

Senators

(Referred to the Committee on Constitutional Legislation, legislation, universal suffrage, the Regulations and general administration, under Subject to the possible establishment of a special commission as provided by the Regulations.)

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

Ladies and Gentlemen,
Law No. 2000-614 of 5 July 2000 on the reception and housing of Travellers has considerably strengthened the obligations of Commons in terms of welcoming travelers.
This law was intended to answer an old question and recurrent, that the stationing of Travellers, and aimed at ending tensions over parking unorganized.
Trying to reconcile freedom of movement of some 150 000 people in France itinerant lifestyle, and the legitimate concern of local officials regarding compliance with the installation site, the law has chosen to bear the shared much of the investment costs and operation of reception areas imposed by the departmental plans for the reception of travelers.
These costs are even higher than many reception areas are subject to degradation by their users. To meet the requirements of safety, hygiene and decency, communities must regularly engage in costly rehabilitation work.
Beyond the financial difficulties faced by communities, the imposition of new charges seemed contrary to the principle of subsidiarity: Travellers is by definition mobile, burdening the common installation and maintenance of facilities in place to accommodate them is not justified.
While the State makes a financial contribution to the achievement and maintenance of such equipment, but subsidies (from 50% to 70% of a maximum expenditure base often less than the actual cost of work) and subsidies symbolic of the overall allocation of equipment and staffing of rural or urban solidarity only partially offset the additional costs actually imposed by municipalities.
Without questioning the principle of departmental schemes and the role of municipalities in their implementation, this bill seeks to reaffirm the role of the state as in installation and maintenance of halting sites in their management ( Article 1 st ).
She proposed that the recording of expenditures necessary for the installation of common areas in the budget under "compulsory expenditure" and the reference to municipal agreements (Article 3 ).
The law of 5 July 2000 required the inclusion of municipalities with more than 5000 people in the departmental plan without taking into account threshold effects of this measure and local needs. It is therefore proposed to delete this requirement to allow for preparation of departmental plan that meets the needs identified by the representative of the State Department and President of the General Council (Article 2 ).
It also seems necessary to empower people moving to these areas home. It therefore provides for the signing of an agreement by the beneficiaries of these areas promise to abide infrastructure to support the work of appropriate restoration and need to participate in financing various services provided (water, electricity ...) ( Article 5).
This is the purpose of this bill that we propose to adopt.

PROPOSED LAW

Article 1 st

The I of Article 1 st of Law No. 2000-614 of 5 July 2000 on the reception and the Habitat Traveller is complemented by a sentence as follows:
"The State provides funding for development, rehabilitation and management of reception areas and high traffic in the first and third paragraphs II of this article. "

Article 2 The second paragraph of II of Article 1 st of Law No. 2000-614 of 5 July 2000 aforementioned is deleted.

I. Article 3 - At the end of the last sentence of Section I of Article 2 of Law No. 2000-614 of July 5, 2000 supra, the words " or contribute financially to the development and maintenance of the reception areas within municipal agreements "are deleted.
II. - First the second sentence of paragraph I of Article 3 of Law No. 2000-614 of 5 July 2000 aforementioned is removed.

Article 4 Section 4 of Act No. 2000-614 of 5 July 2000 above reads:
" Art.4. - The family allowance may participate in the management of expenses incurred for the construction, rehabilitation and management of reception areas referred to in section 1 st manner provided by regulation. "

Article 5 After

Article 9-1 of Act No. 2000-614 of July 5, 2000 supra, is inserted Article 9-2 states:
" Art. 9-2. - Upon arrival on a furnished reception area, travelers agree, by an agreement signed with the manager to maintain the current equipment available to them.
"This agreement is submitted for review to the Advisory Committee referred to in Article IV 1 st of this Act.
"This agreement provides for payment a right to use the reception area and a security deposit within the limits set by regulation. "

I. Article 6 - The financial consequences for the state of the application of this law are compensated due to competition by creating an additional fee to rights under sections 575 and 575A of the General Tax Code.
II. - The financial consequences for social security from the application of this Act shall be compensated pro rata by creating an additional fee to rights under sections 575 and 575A of the General Tax Code.

News Gypsies